Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Obituaries | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-News | RSS
Palo Verde Valley Blythe/Quartzsite Times | Blythe, California and Quartzsite, Arizona

home : opinions : opinions August 19, 2014


1/17/2014 6:00:00 AM
COMMENTARY: Government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich
John Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute
John Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute
John Whitehead
The Rutherford Institute

"[E]verywhere, "time is winding up," in the words of one of our spirituals, "corruption in the land, people take a stand, time is winding up."- Martin Luther King Jr.

We now live in a two-tiered system of governance. There are two sets of laws: one set for the government and its corporate allies, and another set for you and me.

The laws which apply to the majority of the population allow the government to do things like sending SWAT teams crashing through your door in the middle of the night, rectally probing you during a roadside stop, or listening in on your phone calls and reading all of your email messages, confiscating your property, or indefinitely detaining you in a military holding cell. These are the laws which are executed every single day against a population which has up until now been blissfully ignorant of the radical shift taking place in American government.

Then there are the laws constructed for the elite, which allow bankers who crash the economy to walk free. They're the laws which allow police officers to avoid prosecution when they shoot unarmed citizens, strip search non-violent criminals, or taser pregnant women on the side of the road, or pepper spray peaceful protestors. These are the laws of the new age we are entering, an age of neo-feudalism, in which corporate-state rulers dominate the rest of us, where the elite create the laws which can result in a person being jailed for possessing a small amount of marijuana while bankers that launder money for drug cartels walk free. In other words, we have moved into an age where we are the slaves and they are the rulers.

Unfortunately, this two-tiered system of government has been a long time coming. As I detail in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, the march toward an imperial presidency, to congressional intransigence and impotence, to a corporate takeover of the mechanisms of government, and the division of America into haves and have nots has been building for years.

Thus we now find ourselves at a point where, for the first time in history, Congress is dominated by a majority of millionaires who are, on average, 14 times wealthier than the average American. Making matters worse, as the Center for Responsive Politics reports, "at a time when lawmakers are debating issues like unemployment benefits, food stamps and the minimum wage, which affect people with far fewer resources, as well as considering an overhaul of the tax code," our so-called representatives are completely out of touch with the daily struggles of most Americans--those who live from paycheck to paycheck and are caught in the exhausting struggle to survive on a day-to-day basis.

Indeed, although America is supposed to be a representative republic, these people-- who earn six-figure salaries and inhabit a world exempt from parking tickets, where gym membership is free and health care is second-to-none, where you only have to work two, maybe three days a week and get 32 fully reimbursed road trips home a year, travel to foreign lands, discounts in Capitol Hill tax-free shops and restaurants, free reserved parking at Washington National Airport, free fresh-cut flowers from the Botanic Gardens, and free assistance in the preparation of income taxes--neither represent nor serve the American people. They have instead appointed themselves our masters.

While Congress should be America's representative body, too many of its members bear little resemblance to those they have been elected to represent. As Dan Eggen reports for The Washington Post: "The new figures underscore a long-standing trend of wealth accumulation in Congress, which is populated overwhelmingly with millionaires and near-millionaires who often own multiple homes and other assets out of reach for most of the voters they represent."

Many of our politicians live like kings. Chauffeured around in limousines, flying in private jets and eating gourmet meals, all paid for by the American taxpayer, they are far removed from those they are supposed to represent. Such a luxurious lifestyle makes it difficult to identify with the "little guy"--the roofers, plumbers and blue-collar workers who live from paycheck to paycheck and keep the country running with their hard-earned dollars and the sweat of their brows.

The unfortunate but simple fact is that the rich sit perched at the top of the government. As Joseph Stiglitz writes for Vanity Fair:

Virtually all U.S. senators, and most of the representatives in the House, are members of the top 1 percent when they arrive, are kept in office by money from the top 1 percent, and know that if they serve the top 1 percent well they will be rewarded by the top 1 percent when they leave office. By and large, the key executive-branch policymakers on trade and economic policy also come from the top 1 percent. When pharmaceutical companies receive a trillion-dollar gift--through legislation prohibiting the government, the largest buyer of drugs, from bargaining over price--it should not come as cause for wonder. It should not make jaws drop that a tax bill cannot emerge from Congress unless big tax cuts are put in place for the wealthy. Given the power of the top 1 percent, this is the way you would expect the system to work.

Sadly, electoral politics have been so thoroughly corrupted by corporate money that there is little chance, even for a well-meaning person, to affect any real change through Congress. Whether it be the Oval Office or the halls of Congress, the road to the ballot box is an expensive one, and only the wealthy, or those supported by the wealthy, are even able to get to the starting line.

Just consider the 2012 presidential election cycle. Both parties spent $1 billion each attempting to get their candidate elected to the presidency. This money came from rich donors and corporate sponsors, intent on getting their candidate in office. Once in office, these already privileged wealthy bureaucrats enter into a life of even greater privilege, unfortunately at the expense of the American taxpayer. It doesn't even seem to matter whether they're Democrats or Republicans--they all take full advantage of what one news report described as "a mountain of perks that most Fortune 500 companies couldn't begin to rival."

Even President Obama's closest advisers are millionaires, including those on his 15-member cabinet. It is not unusual for some of them to own vacation homes, such as Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human Services, who owns a "summer home worth more than a million dollars."

And then there are the lobbyists, the source of much corruption and exchanging of money in Washington. With an estimated 26 lobbyists per congressman, it should come as no surprise that once elected, even those with the best of intentions seem to find it hard to resist the lure of lobbyist dollars, of which there are plenty to go around.

This lobbying is in turn buoyed by a congressional lifestyle which demands that our representatives spend the majority of their time fund raising for campaigns, rather than responding to the needs of their constituents. In November 2012, the Democratic House leadership offered a model daily schedule to newly elected Democrats which suggests a ten-hour day, five hours of which are dominated by "call time" and "strategic outreach," including fund raisers and correspondence with potential donors. Three or four hours are for actually doing the job they were elected to do, such as attending committee meetings, voting on legislation, and interacting with constituents.

When half of one's time is devoted to asking for money from rich individuals and special interests, there is no way that he can respond to the problems which pervade the country. Even well-meaning Congressmen face a Catch-22 where they are pushed to fundraise to secure their seats, but then once in office, it is basically impossible for them to do their jobs. The full ramifications of this are laid out by Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC):

Any member who follows that schedule will be completely controlled by their staff, handed statements that their staff prepared, speaking from talking points they get emailed from leadership... It really does affect how members of Congress behave if the most important thing they think about is fundraising. You end up being nice to people that probably somebody needs to be questioning skeptically... You won't ask tough questions in hearings that might displease potential contributors, won't support amendments that might anger them, will tend to vote the way contributors want you to vote.

What we are faced with is a government by oligarchy--in other words, one that is of the rich, by the rich and for the rich. Yet the Constitution's Preamble states that it is "we the people" who are supposed to be running things. If our so-called "representative government" is to survive, we must first wrest control of our government from the wealthy elite who run it. That is a problem with no easy solutions, and voting is the least of what we should be doing.

"What they don't want," noted comedian George Carlin, is "a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interests."

A population of citizens capable of critical thinking? That's a good place to start, and it's a sure-fire way to jumpstart a revolution. As Abraham Lincoln said, "Wise men established these great self-evident truths, that when in the distant future some man, some faction, some interest, should set up the doctrine that none but rich men, or none but white men, were entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, their posterity should look up again at the Declaration of Independence and take courage to renew the battle which their fathers began."

Inspiring words, but what do they really mean for those of us laboring under the weight of an overreaching, militarized, corrupt government that grows increasingly so with each passing day?

How can we change this state of affairs? The government is too big, too powerful, and its overlords too entrenched to willingly give up any of its power or wealth. The wisest option is to employ the tactics of past protest movements such as the Bonus Army, the Civil Rights Movement, and the 1960s anti-war movement, all of which used sleep-ins, sit-ins and marches to oppose government policies, counter injustice and bring about meaningful change.

For example, in May of 1932, more than 43,000 people, dubbed the Bonus Army-World War I veterans and their families-marched on Washington. Out of work, destitute and with families to feed, more than 10,000 veterans set up tent cities in the nation's capital and refused to leave until the government agreed to pay the bonuses they had been promised as a reward for their services. The Senate voted against paying them immediately, but the protesters didn't budge. Congress adjourned for the summer, and still the protesters remained encamped. Finally, on July 28, under orders from President Herbert Hoover, the military descended with tanks and cavalry, beating some protesters senseless and setting their makeshift camps on fire. Still, the protesters returned the following year, and eventually their efforts not only succeeded in securing payment of the bonuses but contributed to the passage of the G.I. Bill of Rights.

Similarly, the Civil Rights Movement mobilized hundreds of thousands of people to strike at the core of an unjust and discriminatory society. Likewise, while the 1960s anti-war movement began with a few thousand perceived radicals, it ended with hundreds of thousands of protesters, spanning all walks of life, demanding the end of American military aggression abroad.

What these movements had was a coherent message, the mass mobilization of a large cross section of American society, what Martin Luther King Jr. called a philosophy of "militant nonviolent resistance" and an eventual convergence on the nation's seat of power-Washington, DC-the staging ground for the corporate coup, where the shady deals are cut, where lobbyists and politicians meet, and where corporate interests are considered above all else.

It is no coincidence that just prior to his assassination in April 1968, King was plotting "to build a shantytown in Washington, patterned after the bonus marches of the thirties, to dramatize how many people have to live in slums in our nation."

King's advice still rings true: "We need to put pressure on Congress to get things done. We will do this with First Amendment activity. If Congress is unresponsive, we'll have to escalate in order to keep the issue alive and before it. This action may take on disruptive dimensions, but not violent in the sense of destroying life or property: it will be militant nonviolence."

The balance of power that was once a hallmark of our republic no longer exists. James Madison's warning that "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elected, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny" has, regrettably come to pass.

Clearly, it's time for a mass movement dedicated to change through "militant nonviolence." If not, the shadow of tyranny that now hangs over us will eventually destroy every last semblance of freedom.

"We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor," Martin Luther King Jr. warned in his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail." "It must be demanded by the oppressed."




    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   UPDATE: 10 year old child drowns in Colorado River

•   Obituary: Crystal Lynn Clark

•   Drowning victim identified

•   La Paz County drug round up

•   Shootout with LPCSO ends in arrest



Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, February 21, 2014
Article comment by: Mack K

I wish it was as easy as sit-ins and marches with a unified messege. I think Occupy proved that no longer works for several reasons: the US is now a much more diverse population with diverse needs some of which are at cross odds with each other. Our police forces are now militarized so the risks to safety and freedom are very real. There also exist laws now that paint protesters of a variety of causes as "terrorists." In addition, there are efforts to remove the ability to protest altogether by requiring permits and high fees to apply for a protest. Over and above these obstacles, we have a populace that has been conditioned to be fearful of authority, to obey, and/or to simply tune out through shiny object distractions with Hollywood and technology. They're simply not willing to make the necessary sacrifices that revolutions require. Lastly, the government has used psychology quite well to its benefit to portray protesters as unpatriotic and to pit various demographics against each other. For example, much of what the current administration has pursued has been great for urban citizens but not so great for rural and suburban citizens.

Posted: Friday, February 21, 2014
Article comment by: Mack K

The upper class has almost always been in charge. The difference in the past was that they were more focused on building a nation than their own wealth, and realized it would take the efforts and well-being of all to accomplish their goals for the country. Many of those in charge now are the beneficiaries of their descendants' accumulated wealth through pioneering industries that contributed to building the nation banking, railroads, oil, industrialization, etc. Their primary goal now is to maintain and grow that wealth. It is this that was the catalyst for the creeping laws that created the two-tiered government we have now, and that quickly escalated after 9/11 when they both used the national fear to push through bills such as the Patriot Act, and felt vulnerable themselves to losing their wealth to an enemy that was not so easily identifiable as enemies had been in the past. The risks to their wealth could now come from within as easily as from the outside.
As to the state of the electorate & the Carlin comment. Education has been on the decline ever since the Reagan years, the first amnesty, NCLB, and the educational publishing & testing industries efforts to sculpt curriculum to feed their corporate profits. Education now produces compliant sheep.


Posted: Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Article comment by: @Average Joe

Yes, Joe, tend to agree with you. But, I do believe that this country can still be saved. And we can all have a part in that action. God blessed us before he will, again, but we have to pray and ask him. Now. Daily. All of us.

Posted: Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Article comment by: @Critical Thinker

Agree mostly, except for the use of the term, "ignorant". They are not ignorant or dumb. They just are not informed, making them simply ignorant of truth. That's different. And because the media: (1) produces nothing but "fluff", (2) it does not inform of the real, important news, (3) it is biased, (4) it is not all the relevant facts, (4) it targets air-heads, and mentally lazy people. And, parents go along with it.

Posted: Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Article comment by: Average Joe

There is an excellent movie called "Inside Job" produced in 2010, which won the Oscar for Best Documentary Feature in 2011. It is a must see film. The billionaires are eating our lunch and pulling the strings on our government, and most of us have no idea what is going on. Government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations. Both major parties are owned, lock, stock, and barrel by big business interests. There is no point in us little people arguing Democrat vs Republican, progressive vs conservative. Our corporate masters are absolutely amoral, and absolutely in power.

Posted: Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Article comment by: critical thinker

There aren't too many critical thinkers out there any more - we have 3rd generation non-critical thinkers taking welfare - what's to think about "my momma did it, my gramma did it..." etc. Don't need to think as long as someones feeding and clothing them - 1/2 of america are ignorant, devious or just plain lazy - too hard to think about the details in the voting documents - they just follow what's easy. Being a good informed american and knowing the consequences of a vote for or against is hard - don't have time to research the data about a bill - interfere's with their smart phone texting, video playing lifestyle. The youth are finding out slowly but surely what happens when you dont do the research before voting on a bill, then 2 years later realize the consequences. Obamacare said all along that the young will be paying for everybody else - yet they go out in high #'s and vote for it. Welcome to the consequences of your actions - BUT WE ALL GET TO SUFFER THRU OBAMACARE WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT. Thanx out there to all the ignorant voters who made this happen - get used to paying for your healthcare from now on whether you use it or not. Many things are coming our way thanx to ignorant voters.

Posted: Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Article comment by: Attention, America!

I must admit that I, too, didn't read this column at first. It was a bit long. When I finally did read it, I was compelled to try to attract attention to it. It definitely is a must read. If it doesn't say "term limits" to you, one of us has misread. That isn't all. We have sat, confident that things were going as they should. Obviously, we made a big mistake, one that we will regret greatly. We must open our eyes, open our hearts, and spread this word around, and, most importantly, ACT! Please encourage folks to read this, to think long and hard, and then get involved in making OUR brand of change. And not tomorrow, or next year. NOW.

Posted: Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Article comment by: Buster Webb

Very True!!!



Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search


HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Blythe, CA
Click for weather forecast


Find It Blogs Features Milestones Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Home | Classifieds | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Obituaries | Merchant Guide | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-News | RSS | Site Map
Powered by 72dpi

Copyright 2014 Western News&Info, Inc.® Palo Verde Valley Times is the information source for Blythe, California, Quartzsite, Arizona and surrounding area communities. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Palo Verde Valley Times Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, pvvt.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the site's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the site. Click Here to email your questions or comments to the Webmaster. Palo Verde Valley Times Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.


Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved